On 22 October 2015 at 03:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, September 21, 2015 04:02:43 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> When adding platform and AMBA devices, set the device node's device
>> member to point to it.
>>
>> This speeds lookups considerably and is safe because we only create one
>> of these devices for any given device node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Set the pointer to struct device also for AMBA devices
>> - Unset the pointer to struct device when the platform device is about
>> to be unregistered
>> - Increase the reference count of the device before returning from
>> of_find_device_by_node()
>>
>> drivers/of/platform.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> include/linux/of.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> index 1001efaedcb8..408d89f1d124 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> @@ -32,11 +32,6 @@ const struct of_device_id of_default_bus_match_table[] = {
>> {} /* Empty terminated list */
>> };
>>
>> -static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> -{
>> - return dev->of_node == data;
>> -}
>> -
>> /**
>> * of_find_device_by_node - Find the platform_device associated with a node
>> * @np: Pointer to device tree node
>> @@ -45,10 +40,10 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> */
>> struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> - struct device *dev;
>> -
>> - dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
>> - return dev ? to_platform_device(dev) : NULL;
>> + if (np->device && np->device->bus == &platform_bus_type &&
>> + get_device(np->device))
>> + return to_platform_device(np->device);
>> + return NULL;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_device_by_node);
>>
>> @@ -192,6 +187,8 @@ static struct platform_device *of_platform_device_create_pdata(
>> goto err_clear_flag;
>> }
>>
>> + np->device = &dev->dev;
>> +
>> return dev;
>>
>> err_clear_flag:
>> @@ -272,6 +269,8 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>> goto err_free;
>> }
>>
>> + node->device = &dev->dev;
>> +
>> return dev;
>>
>> err_free:
>> @@ -476,6 +475,8 @@ static int of_platform_device_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> if (of_node_check_flag(dev->of_node, OF_POPULATED_BUS))
>> device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, of_platform_device_destroy);
>>
>> + dev->of_node->device = NULL;
>> +
>> if (dev->bus == &platform_bus_type)
>> platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(dev));
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_AMBA
>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>> index 2194b8ca41f9..eb091be0f8ee 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct device_node {
>> phandle phandle;
>> const char *full_name;
>> struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
>> + struct device *device;
>
> There are cases in which multiple device objects point to the same device_node,
> so is the single struct device pointer here really sufficient?
Only one struct device is registered for a given DT device node when
the DT is scanned (otherwise, of_find_device_by_node wouldn't be
safe).
If some driver makes a struct device to point to a device_node that
already has a struct device associated with it, that's fine.
Regards,
Tomeu
>>
>> struct property *properties;
>> struct property *deadprops; /* removed properties */
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
