Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

On 22-10-15 09:58, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:18:45 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Great to see that you've started working on this again. Last weekend I
ended up working on this too together with Reinder E.N. de Haan <reinder@xxxxxxxxx>
(added to the Cc).

We took a slightly different approach for the gates clocks, see:

https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commits/sunxi-wip

And specifically:

https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/80a1afe319d5d1a0c426d42e75d37f0c64e8ea0b

Combined with:

https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/d508da5feb5048f6674d6b24b58ac9058fb9d877

This deals with the per gate parents the same way the rockchip
clock code does, and it seems to be quite a bit less code then your solution.

Here is a simpler patch:

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
index 6ce9118..8fecaeab 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_simple_gates_setup(struct device_node *node,
  	void __iomem *reg;
  	const __be32 *p;
  	int number, i = 0, j;
+	bool parent_per_gate;
  	u8 clk_bit;
  	u32 index;

@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_simple_gates_setup(struct device_node *node,
  		return;

  	clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
+	parent_per_gate = of_clk_get_parent_count(node) != 1;

  	clk_data = kmalloc(sizeof(struct clk_onecell_data), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!clk_data)
@@ -58,6 +60,8 @@ static void __init sunxi_simple_gates_setup(struct device_node *node,
  	of_property_for_each_u32(node, "clock-indices", prop, p, index) {
  		of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
  					      i, &clk_name);
+		if (parent_per_gate)
+			clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, i);

  		clk_reg = reg + 4 * (index / 32);
  		clk_bit = index % 32;



Yes good one, doing things that way indeed is better.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux