On 10/19/2015 08:24 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 10/18/2015 07:53 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:42:29PM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> [..]
>>>> @@ -294,6 +294,11 @@
>>>> devcfg: devcfg@f8007000 {
>>>> compatible = "xlnx,zynq-devcfg-1.0";
>>>> reg = <0xf8007000 0x100>;
>>>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>>>
>>> You shouldn't need interrupt-parent here. In fact, I suspect it can be
>>> removed from all sibling nodes as well.
>>
>> Correct. But I tend to do it vice-versa. To remove it from amba node and
>> keep it in every IP here. The reason is simple to let everybody know
>> that setting up right interrupt controller is something what they have
>> to care. If you have more interrupt controllers in the system it can be
>> messy.
>
> If you like that, then you'd like the interrupt-extended properly even
> better (I think).
yep. That works for me too.
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
