On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 10/18/2015 07:53 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:42:29PM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
[..]
> >> @@ -294,6 +294,11 @@
> >> devcfg: devcfg@f8007000 {
> >> compatible = "xlnx,zynq-devcfg-1.0";
> >> reg = <0xf8007000 0x100>;
> >> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> >
> > You shouldn't need interrupt-parent here. In fact, I suspect it can be
> > removed from all sibling nodes as well.
>
> Correct. But I tend to do it vice-versa. To remove it from amba node and
> keep it in every IP here. The reason is simple to let everybody know
> that setting up right interrupt controller is something what they have
> to care. If you have more interrupt controllers in the system it can be
> messy.
If you like that, then you'd like the interrupt-extended properly even
better (I think).
> But again. Please remove this patch from this series. This will go to
> mainline through arm-soc but 1/3 and 3/3 will go through Greg. That's
> why please do not include it here.
Not all of the patches in a series need to go through the same
maintainer...splitting them up is common. It's nice seeing related
things out on the list together. (Especially when there is a dependency
at some level).
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
