2015-10-17 18:55 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 10/17/2015 10:53 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> 2015-10-17 8:41 GMT+09:00 Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > [snip] > >>>> >>> So...how can I take 2nd patch of this series in samsung(arm-soc) tree? >>> And this series shouldn't be for fixes for 4.3?...Mike how do you think? >> >> Stephen acked it so I thought everything will go through samsung-soc. >> >> Dear Kukjin, >> Indeed this can go as fix for current cycle... but in the same time >> this does not fix any specific regression. Tomeu did not describe when >> issue happened for the first time so I assumed it was like that >> always. It's up to you. >> > > Sorry for not answering about this series before but I've been in contact > with Tomeu over IRC before he posted it and since you already added your > Reviewed-by tag, I didn't feel the need do to it. > > This is a regression for 4.3 since S2R was working correctly for 4.2 in > Snow, I tested after fixing resume with commit 6fd4899a54a5 ("irqchip: > exynos-combiner: Save IRQ enable set on suspend") and the display was > always enabled on resume. Hmmm, that means the patchset indeed should go as fixes. Thanks for details, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html