On 10/17/15 03:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 16 October 2015 at 19:26, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/16, Michael Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2015-10-15 16:46:27) >>>> On 15.10.2015 19:31, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>>> When the DISP1 power domain is powered off, there's two clocks that need >>>>> to be temporarily reparented to OSC, and back to their original parents >>>>> when the domain is powered on again. >>>>> >>>>> We expose these two clocks in the DT bindings so that the DT node of the >>>>> power domain can reference them. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - Reuse mout_aclk200_p >>>>> - Rename div_aclk300 as div_aclk300_disp >>>>> >>>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h | 4 +++- >>>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Applied to clk-next. >>> >> >> I think Tomeu wanted to take this through arm-soc? Otherwise >> we'll need to provide a stable branch for the dt header. > > Hi, Stephen is right, the second patch depends on this one. > So...how can I take 2nd patch of this series in samsung(arm-soc) tree? And this series shouldn't be for fixes for 4.3?...Mike how do you think? Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
