On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Providing Acks should not (and has not to my knowledge) be a binding > > > > contract to continue providing Acks. However, should more bindings be > > > > submitted which appear as though they are related to a particular > > > > maintainer, then sure, you'll be asked for your expert eye again. > > > > It's a bit concerning when it seems like my review is becoming a blocker > > > for something and I don't understand why. > > > Not necessarily _your_ review. Just someone, other than the > > submitter, who I trust and knows about this stuff. You just happen > > to tick those boxes this time. Cross pollination and knowledge sharing > > is one of the characteristics of MLs which I'm particularly proud of. > > That was what it read like. > > > > When your power budget is in the low double digit microamps and you're > > > trying to respond promptly and reliably to rapidly changing and variable > > > physical inputs it gets complicated. > > > This is exactly why I asked you. > > > Thanks for adding structure to my PoV. ;) > > So, a more specific question would have helped - just a general "any > thoughts" type question isn't very clear. To both comments -- this is how I phrased it: "I either need an Ack from the DT folks, or at least someone who knows about this stuff. Mark perhaps." -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
