On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Providing Acks should not (and has not to my knowledge) be a binding > > > contract to continue providing Acks. However, should more bindings be > > > submitted which appear as though they are related to a particular > > > maintainer, then sure, you'll be asked for your expert eye again. > > It's a bit concerning when it seems like my review is becoming a blocker > > for something and I don't understand why. > Not necessarily _your_ review. Just someone, other than the > submitter, who I trust and knows about this stuff. You just happen > to tick those boxes this time. Cross pollination and knowledge sharing > is one of the characteristics of MLs which I'm particularly proud of. That was what it read like. > > When your power budget is in the low double digit microamps and you're > > trying to respond promptly and reliably to rapidly changing and variable > > physical inputs it gets complicated. > This is exactly why I asked you. > Thanks for adding structure to my PoV. ;) So, a more specific question would have helped - just a general "any thoughts" type question isn't very clear.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
