On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:58PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > HI > How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings in > my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series? Alim, you can simply fold it into your patch. Thanks, Fengguang > On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > >Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > phy-exynos-ufs.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c > >index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644 > >--- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c > >+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c > >@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool match_cfg_to_pwr_mode(u8 desc, u8 required_pwr) > > return false; > > } > > > >-int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr) > >+static int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr) > > { > > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy); > > struct exynos_ufs_phy_cfg **cfgs = ufs_phy->cfg; > >@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ out: > > return 0; > > } > > > >-void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt) > >+static void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt) > > { > > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy); > > > > ufs_phy->lane_cnt = lane_cnt; > > } > > > >-int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy) > >+static int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy) > > { > > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy); > > const unsigned int timeout_us = 100000; > > > _______________________________________________ > kbuild-all mailing list > kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html