Hello.
On 09/18/2015 03:21 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
Define the SILK board dependent part of the SDHI1 (connected to micro-SD slot)
device nodes along with the necessary voltage regulators.
Based on the original patch by Vladimir Barinov
<vladimir.barinov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch is against 'renesas-devel-20150810-v4.2-rc6' tag of Simon Horman's
'renesas.git' repo plus the R8A7794/SILK QSPI patches just re-posted. It needs
the R8A7794 GPIO patches in order to compile.
Changes in version 2:
- removed not working SDHI0 stuff, renamed the patch;
- replaced SDHI1's "wp-gpios" property with "disable-wp".
I am wondering if you could explain the motivation for the "disable-wp"
update
Please see the comment in mmc_sd_get_ro().
and weather it is appropriate for other r8a779* dts files.
In case of micro-SD slots, yes.
The MMC binding document says it should only be specified if the
controller has WP detection logic. We, so far, seem to have been replying on
the GPIOs despite this logic is present (according to the R-Car gen2 SDHI
manuals I have). The driver will first call mmc_gpio_get_ro() and when that
fails due to "wp-gpios" not being specified, it proceeds to reading the
register but that is forbidden by TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE flag set for
the R-Car gen1/2 chips, so 0 is always returned from tmio_mmc_get_ro().
There seems to be no point in going that far (and doing the runtime PM
dances) --
Alternatively, the driver could be fixed to check the flag before the RPM
call unlike what it does now.
If the driver can be updated to do the right thing then that seems
OK, I'll try going this way...
preferable to me. If so would it be the case that the presence of the
"disable-wp" property would not have any run-time effect?
Yes.
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
