> From: pku.leo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:pku.leo@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 2:43 AM > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Sharma Bhupesh > <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: pku.leo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:pku.leo@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 10:27 PM On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:57 > >> AM, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This patch adds bindings for QIXIS FPGA controller found on FSL > boards. > >> > >> A general comment: when you are updating the device tree bindings. > >> You should cc the devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list. > >> > >> > > >> > Some Freescale boards like LS2080AQDS/LS2080ARDB have an on-board > >> > FPGA/CPLD connected to the IFC controller. The bindings specified > >> > in this patch cater to those on-board FPGA/CPLD controllers. > >> > >> We already have the binding defined in > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt. We probably > >> should just move it to a more generic location. > > > > Consolidation of powerpc and ARM bindings is something that needs to > > be targeted by a separate patch-series, perhaps in future. > > > > There are a number of duplications that can be looked into, but I > > don't think this patchset should depend on that. > > There might be some duplication, but we shouldn't be adding more. :) I > would rather you directly updating that file than creating a new file > even though the original one was in a wrong directory. > IMO a PowerPC binding update makes no sense in a ARM machine patchset sent on a arm specific mailing list. I would like to wait to hear what maintainers have to say on the same. Regards, Bhupesh ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
