On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:46:38AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Yes, that is fairly common (ADV75xx is same), and we would not > describe an I2C bus in DT in that case. Same with HPD directly handled > vs. a GPIO line. That is no different than what Doug has said: > ddc-i2c-bus is present if using the SOC's I2C host and absent if using > the HDMI block's DDC functionality. I'm only questioning the location > of the property. No, I don't think that's what Doug wants. Doug wants the bridge's internal I2C host to be exposed, so he can number it through a DT alias. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html