On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 07:04:38 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >> Hi Marek, > > Hi! > >> Le 24/08/2015 13:03, Marek Vasut a écrit : >> > On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:14:00 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >> >> This driver add support to the new Atmel QSPI controller embedded into >> >> sama5d2x SoCs. It expects a NOR memory to be connected to the QSPI >> >> controller. > > [...] > >> >> + /* Compute address parameters */ >> >> + switch (cmd->enable.bits.address) { >> >> + case 4: >> >> + ifr |= QSPI_IFR_ADDRL; >> >> + /*break;*/ /* fallback to the 24bit address case */ >> > >> > What's this commented out bit of code for ? :-) >> >> I just wanted to stress out there was no missing "break;". >> I've reworded the comment to: >> /* No "break" on purpose: fallback to the 24bit address case. */ > > Oh, the address is in bytes . I see, yes, it makes sense to be more > explicit here about the purpose of the fallback. I think this change > in the comment will make it easier for everyone who comes back in a > few years and reads this code. I think you are looking for the term "(switch case) fallthrough", not "fallback". "Fallback" makes it sound like there is something missing, or an invalid state. Jonas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html