On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Loc Ho wrote:
> I intentional left this code as is so that the driver will still works
> with older version of the EDAC code.
Huh, what? I don't think this is how upstream development works.
> I had already reversed the logic for the L3 and SoC. Are you asking
> for the MC/PMD (earlier posting)? The MC/PMD routine isn't that big.
> Functions in general fit in an screen of 80 column?
Only for the ones where it becomes clumsy and flipping it would make the
code more readable. I'm not a hard 80 cols follower anyway.
> So, is there something that I am missing?
I hope you're not. But seeing the custom debugfs stuff left in the new
submission without any comment as to *why* you've left it, made me think
you didn't incorporate all feedback.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
