On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:50:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > NACK. And it has been NACKed before again and again, search > the mailinglist for repetitive answers. Yeah, ok, I give up. This happens with every DT discussion that tries to make things logical for the end user. > The GPIO numbers inside the Linux kernel are Linux specific and > have nothing to do with the hardware numbers. If they sometimes > match it is a lucky coincidence. Someone should tell the users that. > The same goes for IRQ numbers > in the kernel FWIW. Isn't there a mapping interface for irq numbers? > So this "binding" has nothing to do with describing the hardware, > which device tree is for. If it ever comes to exist it needs to be > a "linux-*" property. But I doubt it will. How can you say that the GPIO numbers associated with the pins and appearing in published data sheets (and used in every schematic) are not part of the hardware? Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
