Hi Timur On 24 May 2015 at 02:40, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fu Wei wrote: >> >> I wonder why you are so sure "that SOC won't have an SBSA watchdog in >> it." any documentation ? >> Sorry, I am not a chip design engineer, I can't see why 32-bit ARM >> won't have an SBSA watchdog in it. > > > Because there's no market for it. I'm not talking about what's > theoretically possible. I'm only talking about what makes sense and what > will actually happen. And I'm quite certain that we will never see an > actual 32-bit ARM SOC with an SBSA watchdog device in it. Why are you quite certain? any info you can kindly share here? > > Therefore, it makes no sense to complicated the code so that we can support > an SOC that will never exist. yes, that is a good reason! > > So can we PLEASE stop talking about 32-bit ARM support? why? we are just trying to figure out: Do we need to add ARM in "depends on" for SBSA watchdog driver? If some one suggests this, we need to figure out. > > > -- > Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the > Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
