Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Fu Wei wrote:
I wonder why you are so sure "that SOC won't have an SBSA watchdog in
it."  any documentation ?
Sorry, I am not a chip design engineer, I can't see why 32-bit ARM
won't have an SBSA watchdog in it.

Because there's no market for it. I'm not talking about what's theoretically possible. I'm only talking about what makes sense and what will actually happen. And I'm quite certain that we will never see an actual 32-bit ARM SOC with an SBSA watchdog device in it.

Therefore, it makes no sense to complicated the code so that we can support an SOC that will never exist.

So can we PLEASE stop talking about 32-bit ARM support?

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux