On Friday 22 May 2015 16:21:54 Sanchayan Maity wrote: > +#define OCOTP_CFG0_OFFSET 0x00000410 > +#define OCOTP_CFG1_OFFSET 0x00000420 > +#define MSCM_CPxCOUNT_OFFSET 0x0000002C > +#define MSCM_CPxCFG1_OFFSET 0x00000014 > +#define ROM_REVISION_OFFSET 0x00000080 > + > +static const struct of_device_id vf610_soc_bus_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-mscm-cpucfg", }, > + { /* sentinel */ } > +}; > + > +static int __init vf610_soc_init(void) > +{ > + struct regmap *ocotp_regmap, *mscm_regmap, *rom_regmap; > + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr; > + struct soc_device *soc_dev; > + struct device_node *np; > + char soc_type[] = "xx0"; > + u32 cpxcount, cpxcfg1; > + u32 soc_id1, soc_id2, rom_rev; > + u64 soc_id; > + int ret; > + > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, vf610_soc_bus_match); > + if (!np) > + return -ENODEV; > + Why not use module_platform_driver() and make this a probe function instead? > + ocotp_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,vf610-ocotp"); > + if (IS_ERR(ocotp_regmap)) { > + pr_err("regmap lookup for octop failed\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(ocotp_regmap); > + } > + > + mscm_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,vf610-mscm-cpucfg"); > + if (IS_ERR(mscm_regmap)) { > + pr_err("regmap lookup for mscm failed"); > + return PTR_ERR(mscm_regmap); > + } > + > + rom_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,vf610-ocrom"); > + if (IS_ERR(rom_regmap)) { > + pr_err("regmap lookup for ocrom failed"); > + return PTR_ERR(rom_regmap); > + } Can you use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle instead, and put the phandles in the fsl,vf610-mscm-cpucfg node? Also, I'd argue that the mscm should not be a syscon device at all, but instead I'd use platform_get_resource()/devm_ioremap_resource() to get an __iomem pointer. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html