Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14-05-15, 03:25, Michael Turquette wrote:
> No, we don't understand the problem space well enough to form an ABI.

And why do you think so? We have been facing many problems since a
long time which we are trying to solve here.

I agree that it might not be right to try too many things which may
not be required later, but most of the things we have now in new
bindings are actually required.

> Putting this stuff in C without any philosophical constraints on whether
> or not we can change it later is the way to go.

I don't agree to that :)

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux