> >> Is it necessary to make 'pwms' mandatory ? The current code works > >> just fine with defaults. > > > > The code adding OF support is added just in the next patch, so the > > current code isn't event > > probed when trying to use dts. > > > > Or am I missing something? > > > > The patch introducing devicetree support to the driver doesn't evaluate > the pwm property. That makes it quite obvious that, from driver perspective, > it isn't needed. I don't immediately see why it would add value to _force_ > users to provide pwm frequency, polarity, and the output configuration > if the defaults work just fine. > Got your point now! Thanks.
