On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:39:14AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 17-Mar-25 11:08, Francesco Dolcini wrote: ... > But if Andy and Ilpo are happy to take this as a more monolithic > driver under drivers/platform/aarch64 I'm not going to nack that > approach. I'm okay with the choice as long as it's suffice the purpose. I agree that aarch64 maybe not a good choice after all, but we should start from somewhere. Later on we can move to agnostic folder if needed. The question here is more about MFD/not-MFD. If the former becomes the case, it would need to be under drivers/mfd as Lee asked for that (or even required). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
