On 17/03/2025 06:49, George Moussalem wrote: >>>> >>> >>> Thanks Krzysztof. I did reorder them deliberately based on unit >>> addresses as discussed also in other threads about IPQ9574 and IPQ5332 >>> as I thought it would be neater that way. I'll change it back, reuse >> >> Which discusses were that? What were the reasons to start with parf? >> > > I based the reordering on this patch so assumed that was the direction > (at that time): > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20250128062708.573662-5-quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx/ That's a patch, not a discussion. I don't think anyone suggested changing order or starting with 'parf' entry. Best regards, Krzysztof