пт, 14 бер. 2025 р. о 10:11 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> пише: > > On 14/03/2025 08:59, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > пт, 14 бер. 2025 р. о 09:56 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> пише: > >> > >> On 14/03/2025 08:45, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > >>> The current EPP, ISP and MPE schemas are largely compatible with Tegra114 > >>> and Tegra124, requiring only minor adjustments. Additionally, the TSEC > >>> schema for the Security engine, which is available from Tegra114 onwards, > >>> is included. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> <form letter> > >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > >> > >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully > >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you > >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and > >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. > >> > >> Thank you. > >> </form letter> > >> > > > > I kept reset-names for TSEC since it seems that it is needed, ask > > > reset-names are not needed and the rest is not applied. I don't see > opp-table either. You are exaggerating, I have either changed as you asked or removed property if I cannot provide needed change. About reset-name I mentioned in the changelog and I would like to hear what Thierry thinks about this. About opp-table be more specific please, do I need to provide an opp table in the example, or include some yaml reference, or what? That would be really helpful. > > You didn't bother to acknowledge nor respond to comments, so it is > expected you will implement it fully. Not me to keep checking if you > read each comment and decided to silently ignore it. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
