On 3/11/25 4:11 PM, Vikash Garodia wrote: > > On 3/11/2025 8:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 05:33:53PM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: >>> Not all platforms has a collapsible mx, so use the more generic naming >>> of mx in the binding. >> >> I guess, it wasn't even tested... > Not sure what made you guess so, let me check why my binding checker did not > catch the bot reported warning. You probably checked the compiled DTBs (make dtbs_check / CHECK_DTBS=1), but you also need to test the YAML (make dt_binding_check) This change can't be accepted as-is, because there are already expectations about the naming (and order) of the entries. Because there's a difference, you would normally be expected to add a whole new list, but maybe the dt-bindings maintainers will agree to Dmitry's solution of adding a sneaky enum inside the list Konrad