Hey Heiko, On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 05:25:09PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Freitag, 7. März 2025, 18:07:47 MEZ schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:00:03PM +0800, Chukun Pan wrote: > > > Document pwm compatible for rk3528 which is fallback compatible > > > of rk3328-pwm group. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > to prevent binding warnings it's probably sensible to let both patches > > go in via the same tree at the same time. Feel free to take the binding > > patch via rockchip/arm-soc. > > > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > You already have the rk3562 binding in your for-next branch [0], which > could create merge-conflicts later on. Oh indeed. > This patch already contains it, so should fit neatly onto your branch. > > And binding warnings only come from linux-next, so won't trigger as the > pwm will feed the binding there too :-) > > So I guess it might be better to take the binding through the pwm tree > and me then picking up the dts patch. Fine for me, so I applied the first patch to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next . Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
