Hi Uwe, Am Freitag, 7. März 2025, 18:07:47 MEZ schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:00:03PM +0800, Chukun Pan wrote: > > Document pwm compatible for rk3528 which is fallback compatible > > of rk3328-pwm group. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@xxxxxxxxxx> > > to prevent binding warnings it's probably sensible to let both patches > go in via the same tree at the same time. Feel free to take the binding > patch via rockchip/arm-soc. > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxx> You already have the rk3562 binding in your for-next branch [0], which could create merge-conflicts later on. This patch already contains it, so should fit neatly onto your branch. And binding warnings only come from linux-next, so won't trigger as the pwm will feed the binding there too :-) So I guess it might be better to take the binding through the pwm tree and me then picking up the dts patch. For the binding Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> [0] https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git/commit/?h=pwm/for-next&id=058210e84b48dbb670a6bf72afaed6fbd8043a37
