Re: interrupts or interrupts-extended ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Arnd,

2015-04-30 16:37 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Thursday 30 April 2015 14:57:19 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Hello, device tree folks,
>>
>>
>> Can I ask a little piece of advice?
>>
>> Which is a preferred way for specifying an interrupt property,
>> interrupt-parent & interrupts, or interrupts-extended ?
>>
>>
>> There is only one interrupt controller on my SoC,
>> so I think either should work enough for me.
>>
>
> interrupts is well-understood by more people, I would pick that one normally,
> unless there is a need.
>
> The main purpose of interrupts-extended is to allow one device to have
> multiple interrupts that are handled by different controllers, without
> introducing a (more complex) interrupt-map property in the parent.

OK, I will use interrupt-parent & interrupts.
Thanks for you advice!


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux