On Wed 2015-05-06 13:50:29, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > Am 06.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>: > > > On Wed 2015-05-06 07:19:31, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > >>> Hi Neil, > >>> > >>> On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > >>>> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves. > >>> > >>> Is there a v4 of this that I missed? > >> > >> We did have a lengthy discussion about [PATCH 3/3] how to best (1) > >> represent the slave device in the device tree but as far as I am concerned, > >> I do not see that we have a consensus (2) and the device tree maintainers > >> have no comments or clear guidelines so far. > > > > Yes. Everyone and their dog disagrees > > What a wonderful argument… > I still ask myself who the dog is. Ok, so now device tree maintainers spoke and told you, you are wrong, and you still argue? You'll only attrack more "wonderful" arguments that way. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
