Hi Peter, Am 05.05.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Neil, > > On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote: >> here is version 3 of support for tty-slaves. > > Is there a v4 of this that I missed? We did have a lengthy discussion about [PATCH 3/3] how to best (1) represent the slave device in the device tree but as far as I am concerned, I do not see that we have a consensus (2) and the device tree maintainers have no comments or clear guidelines so far. BR, Nikolaus (1) best with respect to maintainability, flexibility, common design patterns, compatibility and some other factors I don’t know the correct english words for (2) basically the slave can be described as a subnode like for I2C bus slaves or the slave device can reference the uart it is connected to like for GPIOs and regulators-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
