On 05/06/2015 07:50 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > No, I am not playing devil’s advocate (which would imply that I am doing this > for fun to tease the dog), but I feel I have to be the advocate of future board > designers who want to easily import an existing board DT and overwrite device > tree nodes to describe design changes, i.e. what slave device is connected to > which uart. I dont' see a big distinction at the DTS source level, so your concern is wrt binary dtbs? > At least in this regard, the alternatives are really differently easy to handle. > > And, the alternatives have some influence how a tty driver and a slave device > driver is designed. So that is for me the root question, before discussing (some) > implementation details. I would expect _no_ impact on the tty driver; have I overlooked something? Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
