On 2/24/25 22:34, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 12:11 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:59:45 -0600, Eddie James wrote:
The Balcones system is similar to Bonnell but with a POWER11 processor.
Changes since v1:
- Add all the ucd9000 driver supported compatible strings
- Fix node ordering in Balcones device tree
- Improve commit message to explain addition of ibm-power11-dual.dtsi
Eddie James (3):
dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: add IBM Balcones board
dt-bindings: hwmon: ucd90320: Add additional compatible strings
ARM: dts: aspeed: Add Balcones system
.../bindings/arm/aspeed/aspeed.yaml | 1 +
.../bindings/hwmon/pmbus/ti,ucd90320.yaml | 6 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile | 1 +
.../dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts | 594 +++++++++++++
.../arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi | 779 ++++++++++++++++++
.../arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-quad.dtsi | 769 +----------------
6 files changed, 1383 insertions(+), 767 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi
--
2.43.5
My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.
...
arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dtb: gpio@1e780000: 'usb-power-hog' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/aspeed,ast2400-gpio.yaml#
Ah, can you address this one?
arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dtb: /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c@400/pwm@53: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['maxim,max31785a']
arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dtb: pressure-sensor@76: '#io-channel-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/trivial-devices.yaml#
And these also?
The rest looked like the usual noise.
Well, all of these errors are also present in Blueridge. I would need to
write a new binding for dps310, move max31785 to yaml format, and I'm
not sure how to fix the gpio hog one. I don't see that error when I run
CHECK_DTBS myself... any suggestions?
Thanks!
Eddie
Andrew
