> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] reset: aspeed: register AST2700 reset auxiliary bus
> device
>
> On Mo, 2025-02-24 at 11:15 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 24/02/2025 11:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 24/02/2025 10:55, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +static void aspeed_reset_unregister_adev(void *_adev) {
> > > > + struct auxiliary_device *adev = _adev;
> > > > +
> > > > + auxiliary_device_delete(adev);
> > > > + auxiliary_device_uninit(adev);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void aspeed_reset_adev_release(struct device *dev) {
> > > > + struct auxiliary_device *adev = to_auxiliary_dev(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + kfree(adev);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Every exported function *must* have kerneldoc.
> > >
> > > > +int aspeed_reset_controller_register(struct device *clk_dev, void
> __iomem *base,
> > > > + const char *adev_name)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct auxiliary_device *adev;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + adev = kzalloc(sizeof(*adev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!adev)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + adev->name = adev_name;
> > > > + adev->dev.parent = clk_dev;
> > > > + adev->dev.release = aspeed_reset_adev_release;
> > > > + adev->id = 666u;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = auxiliary_device_init(adev);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + kfree(adev);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = auxiliary_device_add(adev);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + auxiliary_device_uninit(adev);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + adev->dev.platform_data = (__force void *)base;
> > > > +
> > > > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(clk_dev,
> > > > +aspeed_reset_unregister_adev, adev); }
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(aspeed_reset_controller_register);
> > >
> > > No, you cannot export functions without users. There is no single
> > > user of this, so this is not justified at all.
> > My mistake, I missed patch #3 which uses it.
> >
> > I don't get why do you need to export this in the first place, instead
> > of putting it in the clock driver, as usually expected. Handling child
> > creation is logically the task of the device having children, the
> > parent. Not the child.
>
> Also, consider basing this on top of:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250218-aux-device-create-helper-v4-0-c3d7dfdea
> 2e6@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
Hello, Base on this series, I will use adev = devm_auxiliary_device_create instead addev_alloc, adev_releas.
But it still have EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(aspeed_reset_controller_register);
Am I right?
> regards
> Philipp
