Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clock, reset: rockchip: Add support for rk3562

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, 24. Februar 2025, 09:47:40 MEZ schrieb Kever Yang:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 2024/12/27 16:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:23:09PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> >> From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Add the dt-bindings header for the rk3562, that gets shared between
> >> the clock controller and the clock references in the dts.
> >> Add softreset ID for rk3562.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - rename the file to rockchip,rk3562-cru.h
> >> - remove CLK_NR_CLKS
> >> - add new file for reset ID
> >> - update to use dual license
> >>
> >>   .../dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h   | 377 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   .../dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h   | 360 +++++++++++++++++
> >
> > No, that's not a separate patch. Headers *ALWAYS* go with the bindings
> > patch.
> Will fix.
> >>   2 files changed, 737 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h
> >>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..ad07ad3a12ad
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
> > Why not using license requested by checkpatch?
> 
> The checkpatch does not report error/warning for this license, and this 
> is the same as many other SoCs.
> 
> Which license is recommend in the header file?

I suppose

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) */

According to [0] "GPL-2.0" and "GPL-2.0-only" are equivalent, but I guess
"GPL-2.0-only" simply makes the "only" part more visible.


Heiko

[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0







[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux