On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:36:21PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > There are currently two passive trip points defined for the CPU, but no > cooling devices are attached to the thermal zones. We don't have support > for cpufreq upstream yet, but actually this is redundant anyway because the > CPU is throttled automatically when reaching high temperatures. > > Drop the passive trip points and keep just the critical shutdown as safety > measure in case the throttling fails. > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Perhaps we should backport this one as well in case the current passive trip points cause unnecessary work to done for no reason. Either way: Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> Johan
