On 04/29/2015 08:07 PM, Alban wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:42:32 -0300 > Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 04/24/2015 08:41 AM, Alban Bedel wrote: >>> This series add OF bindings and code support for the interrupt >>> controllers, clocks and GPIOs. However it was only tested on a >>> TL-WR1043ND with an AR9132, others SoCs are untested, and a few are >>> not supported at all. >>> > >> Hi Alban, > > Hi, > >> I've booted a Carambola2 using this (plus a custom devicetree and some >> small changes): >> >> Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Just a small comment/question: Shouldn't we allow to build all the >> devicetree files, instead of just the one that will be built-in? >> >> I.e., something like this: >> >> dtb-$(CONFIG_MATCH_ATH79_DT) += ar9132_tl_wr1043nd_v1.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_ATH79_DT) += ar9331_carambola2.dtb >> >> It should be useful to catch errors, but also in general, as the >> devicetree is supposed to be independent of the kernel and should be >> built separate from it. > > Yes, that would be better, I'll fix that. > >> PS: This series depends on a previous patchset. It's usually useful to >> mention this in the cover letter and make a poor tester's life >> easier :) > >>> Most code changes base on the previous bug fix series: >>> [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: ath79: Various small fix to prepare OF support > > Wasn't that clear enough? > Ugh, somehow I managed to miss that. Sorry for the noise, -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
