Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2025, 13:44:15 MEZ schrieb Nicolas Frattaroli: > On Monday, 10 February 2025 23:45:04 Central European Standard Time Heiko > Stuebner wrote: > > This enables OTP support in the nvmem driver for rk3576. > > > > I expect to pick the clock patch (patch1) and the arm64-dts patch (patch6) > > myself, after the nvmem-driver and -binding patches have been applied > > (patches 2-5). > > > > But kept them together for people wanting to try this series. > > > > changes in v2: > > - fix register constant in clock definition (Diederik) > > - add patch to set limits on variant-specific clock-names > > - use correct limits for clocks + resets on rk3576 binding > > > > > > RESEND, because I messed up my git-send-email which caused it to include > > the list of patches 2 times, duplicating everything :-( . > > > > Heiko Stuebner (6): > > clk: rockchip: rk3576: define clk_otp_phy_g > > nvmem: rockchip-otp: Move read-offset into variant-data > > dt-bindings: nvmem: rockchip,otp: add missing limits for clock-names > > dt-bindings: nvmem: rockchip,otp: Add compatible for RK3576 > > nvmem: rockchip-otp: add rk3576 variant data > > arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3576 otp node > > > > .../bindings/nvmem/rockchip,otp.yaml | 25 ++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576.dtsi | 39 +++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3576.c | 2 + > > drivers/nvmem/rockchip-otp.c | 17 +++++++- > > 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Hi Heiko, > > for the entire series: > > Tested-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > OTPs show up on my Sige5 RK3576 board and read fine. Also compared the OTP > nodes to downstream and the values look consistent with that. The OTPs aren't > documented in the TRM I have, so unfortunately I can't cross-reference that. thanks a lot for the testing :-) > NB: patchwork's "Series" download for this series somehow lacks patch 2/6, > which tripped me up at first. Not sure if that's a problem with patchwork or > with how you sent the series out, but I thought I'd let others know who run > into this. It looks like patchwork had a bigger hickup with my series. Looking at the cover-letter in the Rockchip area of patchwork, it is missing _all_ patches attached to it [0]. At least on the mainling list, everything seems to have arrived ok [1], so would assume that's a patchwork thing. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/cover/20250210224510.1194963-1-heiko@xxxxxxxxx/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250210224510.1194963-1-heiko@xxxxxxxxx/
