On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This useful binding should be accepted and people should not abuse > > it. If they do and the vendor Maintainer's review and accept then > > they have no foundation for recourse. > > > > Would you prefer it if I made the warning starker? > > Perhaps you can add a check for "clock-always-on" to scripts/checkpatch.pl, > to make people aware they should think twice? That's a really nice idea! Maxime, would that make you happ(y|ier)? > Nah, people don't read documentation, don't run checkpatch, ignore compiler > warnings, etc... :) You can only wrap people in so much cotton wool. If they then decide to ignore all the warnings and jump, woe betide them. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
