> -----Original Message----- > From: Baruch Siach [mailto:baruch@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 2015年4月29日 9:26 > To: Wang Shenwei-B38339 > Cc: shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx: make the imx timer driver implementation > independent of SoCs. > > Hi Shenwei Wang, > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:14:41AM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote: > > There are 4 versions of the timer hardware on Freescale MXC hardware. > > --Version 0: MX1/MXL > > --Version 1: MX21, MX27. > > --Version 2: MX25, MX31, MX35, MX37, MX51, MX6Q --Version 3: MX6DL, > > MX6SX > > > > This patch has removed the SoC related codes, and implemented the > > driver directly upon the hardware timer IP version. > > > > The new driver can be installed via device tree or the direct function > > call to mxc_timer_init in order to support imx legacy systems like > > MX21 and MX27. > > > > For the device tree implementation, the driver is compatible with the > > current bindings like "fsl,imx6q-gpt", but for future dts file, the > > string like "fsl,imx-gpt-v2" without SoC information is recommended. > > That is not the usual convention for IP block versions. > > Please Cc the devicetree list (added). > Thank you for the comments. What is the current naming rules for IP block version? It would be appreciated if you could provide an example. Shenwei > baruch > > -- > http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open > Systems > =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= > - baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il - ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n????z谵{???塄}?财??j:+v?? ? ???2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f
