Re: [PATCH 00/10] arm64 support for Milk-V Duo Module 01 EVB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Inochi!

On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 21:55 +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> > > It would probably make sense that the whole series would go into SOC tree,
> > > even though technically nothing prevents the reboot/reset driver to come
> > > in PM/reset tree. If everything would come together, `reboot` command would
> > > work out of the box.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://milkv.io/docs/duo/getting-started/duo-module-01
> > > [2] https://github.com/milkv-duo/duo-buildroot-sdk-v2/releases/
> > > [3] https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/download/sg2000-trm-v1.01/sg2000_trm_en.pdf
> > > 
> > 
> > This reboot implentment across the RTC and 8051 domain, which is
> > still a big problem to be upstreamed. This should be designed 
> 
> Now I've got it. The problem is not in the reboot procedure, but
> rather how to model this thing in the DT, because of all these
> unrelated functions brought into two HW address spaces...
> 
> > carefully and needs further discussion. Adding these two syscon
> > compatiable may be not a good idea and cause some problem. I invite
> > Yixun to this talk and he may give some useful suggestions.
> > 
> > At last, I prefer this goes to an separate patch series, and
> > implement with rtc device.

Thanks for your hints!
I've completely missed the RTC driver in progress [1].
I will provide a patch registering the reboot handler on top of the driver
as soon as it's accepted.

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/rtc-linux/patch/20240428060848.706573-3-qiujingbao.dlmu@xxxxxxxxx/

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin.






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux