On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 07:26:18PM +0800, zhangzekun (A) wrote:
> 在 2025/2/10 18:03, Laurent Pinchart 写道:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:47:28PM +0800, zhangzekun (A) wrote:
> >>> I think we all agree that of_find_node_by_name() is miused, and that it
> >>> shows the API isn't optimal. What we have different opinions on is how
> >>> to make the API less error-prone. I think adding a new
> >>> of_find_node_by_name_balanced() function works around the issue and
> >>> doesn't improve the situation much, I would argue it makes things even
> >>> more confusing.
> >>>
> >>> We have only 20 calls to of_find_node_by_name() with a non-NULL first
> >>> argument in v6.14-rc1:
> >>>
> >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/pci.c: rtas = of_find_node_by_name (root, "rtas");
> >>>
> >>> The 'root' variable here is the result of a call to
> >>> 'of_find_node_by_path("/")', so I think we could pass a null pointer
> >>> instead to simplify things.
> >>>
> >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c: slave = of_find_node_by_name(master, "mac-io");
> >>>
> >>> Here I believe of_find_node_by_name() is called to find a *child* node
> >>> of 'master'. of_find_node_by_name() is the wrong function for that.
> >>>
> >>> arch/sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c: np = of_find_node_by_name(rootnp, "GAISLER_IRQMP");
> >>> arch/sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c: np = of_find_node_by_name(rootnp, "01_00d");
> >>> arch/sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c: np = of_find_node_by_name(nnp, "GAISLER_GPTIMER");
> >>> arch/sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c: np = of_find_node_by_name(nnp, "01_011");
> >>>
> >>> Here too the code seems to be looking for child nodes only (but I
> >>> couldn't find a DT example or binding in-tree, so I'm not entirely
> >>> sure).
> >>>
> >>> drivers/clk/ti/clk.c: return of_find_node_by_name(from, tmp);
> >>>
> >>> Usage here seems correct, the reference-count decrement is intended.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c: i2c_mux = of_find_node_by_name(dev->of_node, "i2c-mux");
> >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c: enp = of_find_node_by_name(dev->of_node, node_name);
> >>> drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c: ports = of_find_node_by_name(dn, "ports");
> >>> drivers/net/dsa/hirschmann/hellcreek_ptp.c: leds = of_find_node_by_name(hellcreek->dev->of_node, "leds");
> >>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/asp2/bcmasp.c: ports_node = of_find_node_by_name(dev->of_node, "ethernet-ports");
> >>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c: ports = of_find_node_by_name(sw->np, "ports");
> >>> drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c: channels_node = of_find_node_by_name(priv->np, "channels");
> >>> drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c: np = of_find_node_by_name(handle->dev->of_node, "regulators");
> >>> drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c: np = of_find_node_by_name(tps->dev->of_node, multi_regs[multi].supply_name);
> >>>
> >>> Incorrect usage, as far as I understand all those drivers are looking
> >>> for child nodes only.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/of/unittest.c: found = of_find_node_by_name(nd->overlay, "test-unittest16");
> >>> drivers/of/unittest.c: found = of_find_node_by_name(nd->overlay, "test-unittest17");
> >>> drivers/of/unittest.c: found = of_find_node_by_name(nd->overlay, "test-unittest18");
> >>> drivers/of/unittest.c: found = of_find_node_by_name(nd->overlay, "test-unittest19");
> >>>
> >>> Here too I think only child nodes are meant to be considered.
> >>>
> >>> of_find_node_by_name() is very much misused as most callers want to find
> >>> child nodes, while of_find_node_by_name() will walk the whole DT from a
> >>> given starting point.
> >>>
> >>> I think the right fix here is to
> >>>
> >>> - Replace of_find_node_by_name(root, ...) with
> >>> of_find_node_by_name(NULL, ...) in arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/pci.c
> >>> (if my understanding of the code is correct).
> >>
> >> For arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/pci.c, noticing that there is a comment
> >> in setup_peg2():
> >> /* keep the reference to the root node */
> >>
> >> It might can not be convert to of_find_node_by_name(NULL, ...), and the
> >> origin use of of_find_node_by_name() put the ref count which want to be
> >> kept.
> >
> > But the reference is dropped by of_find_node_by_name(). Unless I'm
> > missing something, dropping the lien
> >
> > struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> >
> > and changing
> >
> > rtas = of_find_node_by_name (root, "rtas");
> >
> > to
> >
> > rtas = of_find_node_by_name (NULL, "rtas");
> >
> > will not change the behaviour of the code.
>
> Hi, Laurent,
>
> I think that the original code try to keep the refcount get by
> of_find_node_by_path(), but leak it accidently by
> of_find_node_by_name(). I am not sure that what driver really wants to
> do and if it has a bug here.
Looking at the git history, I don't think the code needs or tries to
keep a reference to the root node.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
