On 09/02/2025 18:28, J. Neuschäfer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:44:59PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: >> On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:30:26 +0100, J. Neuschäfer wrote: > [...] >>> .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.yaml | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/lbc.txt | 43 ------ >>> 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > [...] >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-0/localbus@f0010100/simple-periph@2,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio'] >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-1/localbus@e0005000/nand@1,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,mpc8315-fcm-nand', 'fsl,elbc-fcm-nand'] >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-1/localbus@e0005000/nand@1,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,mpc8315-fcm-nand', 'fsl,elbc-fcm-nand'] > > I think this is due to how the patches are ordered in the series. If that's possible, this should be fixed, e.g. by re-ordering the patches. > This patch uses fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio and fsl,elbc-fcm-nand in examples, but > comes before the patches that define the corresponding bindings. Best regards, Krzysztof
