On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:44:59PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: > On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:30:26 +0100, J. Neuschäfer wrote: [...] > > .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.yaml | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/lbc.txt | 43 ------ > > 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) [...] > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-0/localbus@f0010100/simple-periph@2,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio'] > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-1/localbus@e0005000/nand@1,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,mpc8315-fcm-nand', 'fsl,elbc-fcm-nand'] > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-1/localbus@e0005000/nand@1,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,mpc8315-fcm-nand', 'fsl,elbc-fcm-nand'] I think this is due to how the patches are ordered in the series. This patch uses fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio and fsl,elbc-fcm-nand in examples, but comes before the patches that define the corresponding bindings.
