Hi, On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:13 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:12:45AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:13 AM Langyan Ye > > <yelangyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Add "csot" to the Devicetree Vendor Prefix Registry. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > > index 42d14899d584..375f1f7c79ef 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ patternProperties: > > > description: Crystalfontz America, Inc. > > > "^csky,.*": > > > description: Hangzhou C-SKY Microsystems Co., Ltd > > > + "^csot,.*": > > > + description: Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd > > > > Doing a `git log` on > > `Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml` shows that > > most patches use the subject prefix `dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes`, > > not `dt-bindings: vendor`. If device-tree folks care about this > > difference and they don't want to fix it when applying, they might > > request you to send a new version. > > > > In any case, that's fairly minor so I'm OK with: > > > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I would assume this will go through the DT tree, not drm-misc. If this > > is wrong then someone should shout. > > idk, probably the whole series should go together via drm-misc. > %subject can change if there's a resubmission, otherwise > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ah, I'm fine landing it with drm-misc. I'll land it tomorrow unless there are objections. I'll adjust the subject when landing. -Doug
