On 05/02/2025 16:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/02/2025 16:35, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2025 11:49, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:30:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 28/01/2025 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -479,6 +519,230 @@ frame@b128000 {
>>>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pcie1: pcie@18000000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x00088000 0x3000>,
>>>>>
>>>>> So as Konrad pointed out now, this was never tested. It's not we who
>>>>> should run tests for you. It's you.
>>>>
>>>> This was tested and it did not flag an error since it is having the order
>>>> specified in the bindings. qcom,pcie.yaml has 4 reg specifications. Two of
>>>
>>>
>>> Hm, then please paste results of dtbs_check W=1 testing. Here.
>>>
>>> I am 100% sure you have there warning and I don't understand your
>>> reluctance to run the tests even after pointing it out by two people.
>>
>> I ran the tests. Not sure which portions to paste. Have attached the full
>> output just in case you are interested in some other detail. Please take a
>> look.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Varada
>>
>> $ grep ipq.*dtb dtbs-check.log
>
> Where is the command you have used?
Although that might not matter - you skipped several warnings with your
grep. So maybe you need to fix your process, not sure.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
