On 03/02/2025 10:44, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
> On 1/30/2025 1:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/01/2025 05:35, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>>> @@ -2646,6 +2663,136 @@ static int ath12k_qmi_alloc_target_mem_chunk(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int ath12k_qmi_assign_target_mem_chunk(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *mem_node;
>>> + struct resource res, m3_res;
>>> + u32 bdf_start_addr;
>>> + int i, idx, ret;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < ab->qmi.mem_seg_count; i++) {
>>> + switch (ab->qmi.target_mem[i].type) {
>>> + case HOST_DDR_REGION_TYPE:
>>> + mem_node = ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name(ab, "q6-region");
>>
>>
>> Why cannot you use existing API for reserved memory -
>> of_reserved_mem_lookup()?
>>
>
> The of_reserved_mem_lookup() requires reserved memory node to read the memory and
> return in the structure "struct reserved_mem".
>
> The of_reserved_mem_lookup() would be used after we get the reserved memory node
> using the API - ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name(ab, "q6-region");
>
> In next version we would use of_reserved_mem_lookup(), Something like below:
> mem_node = ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name(ab, "q6-region");
Then why do you need ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name() in the first
place? Just use of_reserved_mem_lookup() directly. Why do you need to
parse phandle before of_reserved_mem_lookup()?
> struct reserved_mem res = of_reserved_mem_lookup(mem_node)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
