On 1/30/2025 1:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/01/2025 05:35, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>> @@ -2646,6 +2663,136 @@ static int ath12k_qmi_alloc_target_mem_chunk(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int ath12k_qmi_assign_target_mem_chunk(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *mem_node;
>> + struct resource res, m3_res;
>> + u32 bdf_start_addr;
>> + int i, idx, ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < ab->qmi.mem_seg_count; i++) {
>> + switch (ab->qmi.target_mem[i].type) {
>> + case HOST_DDR_REGION_TYPE:
>> + mem_node = ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name(ab, "q6-region");
>
>
> Why cannot you use existing API for reserved memory -
> of_reserved_mem_lookup()?
>
The of_reserved_mem_lookup() requires reserved memory node to read the memory and
return in the structure "struct reserved_mem".
The of_reserved_mem_lookup() would be used after we get the reserved memory node
using the API - ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name(ab, "q6-region");
In next version we would use of_reserved_mem_lookup(), Something like below:
mem_node = ath12k_core_get_reserved_mem_by_name(ab, "q6-region");
struct reserved_mem res = of_reserved_mem_lookup(mem_node)
