On 01/02/2025 16:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 27.01.2025 9:26 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 04:31:18AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> (Almost?) all QMP PHYs come with both a "full reset" ("phy") and a
>>> "retain certain registers" one ("phy_nocsr").
>>>
>>> Drop the maxItems=1 constraint for resets and reset_names as we go
>>> ahead and straighten out the DT usage. After that's done (which
>>> will involve modifying some clock drivers etc.), we may set
>>> *min*Items to 2, bar some possible exceptions.
>>
>> You drop minItems now, so that's a bit confusing. If all devices have
>> two resets, just change in top-level resets the minItems -> 2 now and
>> mention that it does not affect the ABI, because Linux will support
>> missing reset and it describes the hardware more accurately.
>
> This will generate a ton of warnings and resolving them may take an
> additional cycle, as I'd need to get things merged through clk too,
> so I thought this is a good transitional solution
I still don't understand why existing devices now get 1 reset, while
previously they had minItems:2.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
