On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:31:18 -0600 David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/29/25 5:03 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > > From: Guillaume Stols <gstols@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The register read/write with IIO backend will require to claim the > > direct mode, and doing so requires passing the corresponding iio_dev > > structure. > > So we need to modify the function signature to pass the iio_dev > > structure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > I don't think calling iio_device_claim_direct_mode() inside there reg_read/write > functions is the right place to do that. It should be done at a higher level (in > case we need to combine multiple reads/writes in an atomic operation). So I > think we should drop this patch. > I think this is a tricky corner if it is only needed when the backend is involved. Not sure what the best answer is as we probably don't want the higher levels having to comprehend that it is sometimes needed and sometimes not. Maybe fine to add it in all cases, but that sounds like it risks an ABI change. Jonathan