On 24.01.2025 7:12 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:32:20PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>> The current implementation requires iATU for every configuration
>> space access which increases latency & cpu utilization.
>>
>> Designware databook 5.20a, section 3.10.10.3 says about CFG Shift Feature,
>> which shifts/maps the BDF (bits [31:16] of the third header DWORD, which
>> would be matched against the Base and Limit addresses) of the incoming
>> CfgRd0/CfgWr0 down to bits[27:12]of the translated address.
>>
>> Configuring iATU in config shift feature enables ECAM feature to access the
>> config space, which avoids iATU configuration for every config access.
>>
>> Add "ctrl2" into struct dw_pcie_ob_atu_cfg to enable config shift feature.
>>
>> As DBI comes under config space, this avoids remapping of DBI space
>> separately. Instead, it uses the mapped config space address returned from
>> ECAM initialization. Change the order of dw_pcie_get_resources() execution
>> to achieve this.
>>
>> Enable the ECAM feature if the config space size is equal to size required
>> to represent number of buses in the bus range property, add a function
>> which checks this. The DWC glue drivers uses this function and decide to
>> enable ECAM mode or not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Some minor comments inline. Overall, the patch LGTM!
>
>> ---
[...]
>> +bool dw_pcie_ecam_supported(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pci->dev);
>> + struct resource *config_res, *bus_range;
>> + u64 bus_config_space_count;
>> +
>> + bus_range = resource_list_first_type(&pp->bridge->windows, IORESOURCE_BUS)->res;
>> + if (!bus_range)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + config_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "config");
>> + if (!config_res)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + bus_config_space_count = resource_size(config_res) >> PCIE_ECAM_BUS_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + return bus_config_space_count >= resource_size(bus_range);
>
> return !!(bus_config_space_count >= resource_size(bus_range));
You made me think that there's some weird interaction here, but C99 says
"Each of the operators < (less than), > (greater than), <= (less than or equal to),
and >= (greater than or equal to) shall yield 1 if the specified relation is true and
0 if it is false.89) The result has type int"
so I'm not sure this is necessary
Konrad
