On 14/01/2025 10:10, Dario Binacchi wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 10:25 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 10:18:28PM +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote: >>> +maintainers: >>> + - Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> + >>> +description: | >>> + The RCC IP is both a reset and a clock controller. >>> + The reset phandle argument is the bit number within the RCC registers bank, >>> + starting from RCC base address. >>> + >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + oneOf: >>> + - items: >>> + - const: st,stm32f42xx-rcc >>> + - const: st,stm32-rcc >>> + - items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - st,stm32f469-rcc >>> + - const: st,stm32f42xx-rcc >>> + - const: st,stm32-rcc >>> + - items: >>> + - const: st,stm32f746-rcc >> >> Why this isn't just part of enum with first group/list? Different >> groups/lists are for different fallbacks and I am pretty sure fallback >> is the same. > > I tried running tests after applying the changes you suggested, but > the tests are failing. And? Fix the code then? Best regards, Krzysztof
